Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 Iinfection in Immunocompromised Children

Background The temporal dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in immunocompromised children (IC) are unknown but may have important infection control implications. We evaluated SARS-CoV-2 viral persistence and assessed factors associated with viral persistence and cycle threshold (CT) values as a surrogate of viral load for IC. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2-positive IC at a large quaternary pediatric hospital from March 2020-2021. Immunocompromised status was defined as primary or secondary/acquired immunodeficiencies due to comorbidities or immunosuppressive treatment. The primary outcome was time to first-of-two consecutively negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests ≥ 24 hours apart. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of sequential patient samples was conducted using the Centers for Disease Control 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel (CDC assay). Chi-square, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare demographic and clinical characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curve median event times and log-rank tests were used to compare outcomes. Subjects without 2 consecutive negative tests censored at the last test. Analyses were conducted using SAS v 9.4. Results Ninety-one children met inclusion criteria, and 67 children had more than 1 test (Figure 1). Median age was 15.5 years (IQR 8-18 yrs), 64% were male, 58% of children were white, and 43% were Latinx. Most (67%) were tested in outpatient settings, and 58% of children were asymptomatic. The median time to two negative tests was 42 days (IQR 25.0,55.0), with no difference in duration of positivity with specific diagnoses, degree of lymphopenia, or symptomatic vs asymptomatic illness. Five of 7 (71%) children with samples available for repeat testing had initial CT values < 30, indicating a moderate to high viral load, and of these, 4 (57%) had repeat testing 21 to 30 days later with CT values < 30 (Figure 2), suggesting persistence of moderate to high viral loads. Figure 1. Plot of immunocompromised children in cohort with positive SARS CoV2 PCR and subsequent testing (n = 67). Timelines of immunocompromised children in cohort with positive SARS CoV2 PCR and subsequent testing, grouped by immunocompromising condition. Each line represents an individual patient. Positive results are shown in light grey, negative results are shown in black. Figure 2. Plot of CT values from SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing over time among children with sequential samples available for retesting (n = 7) Plot of CT values (y axis) from SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing on the CDC assay over time (x axis) in days from initial positive test. Repeated testing which yielded a negative result on the CDC assay or intermittent negative results on clinical testing represented as CT value of 40. Each line represents a unique patient. Conclusion The median duration of viral persistence among IC with SARS-CoV-2 infection was 6 weeks, with no significant difference in immunocompromised diagnoses or clinical presentation, with over half of children with testing on the same platform having moderate to high viral loads after 3 weeks, suggesting potential transmission risk. Disclosures Samuel R. Dominguez, MD, PhD, BioFire Diagnostics (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)DiaSorin Molecular (Consultant)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support) Samuel R. Dominguez, MD, PhD, BioFire (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant, Research Grant or Support;DiaSorin Molecular (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant;Pfizer (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support Suchitra Rao, MBBS, MSCS, BioFire (Research Grant or Support)

SARS-CoV-2 persistence in immunocompromised children.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the length of time immunocompromised children (ICC) remain positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), identified factors associated with viral persistence, and determined cycle threshold (CT ) values of children with viral persistence as a surrogate of viral load. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ICC at a pediatric hospital from March 2020 to March 2021. Immunocompromised status was defined as primary, secondary, or acquired due to medical comorbidities/immunosuppressive treatment. The primary outcome was time to first of two consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests at least 24 hours apart. Testing of sequential clinical specimens from the same subject was conducted using the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2019-nCoV real-time reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR Diagnostic Panel assay. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier curve median event times and log-rank tests were used to compare outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Ninety-one children met inclusion criteria. Median age was 15.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 8-18), 64% were male, 58% were White, and 43% were Hispanic/Latinx. Most (67%) were tested in outpatient settings and 58% were asymptomatic. The median time to two negative tests was 42 days (IQR 25.0-55.0), with no differences in median time by illness presentation or level of immunosuppression. Seven children had more than one sample available for repeat testing, and five of seven (71%) children had initial CT values of <30 (moderate to high viral load); four children had CT values of <30, 3-4 weeks later, suggesting persistent moderate to high viral loads. CONCLUSIONS: Most ICC with SARS-CoV-2 infection had mild disease, with prolonged viral persistence >6 weeks and moderate to high viral load.

Risk Factors for Severe COVID-19 in Children.

BACKGROUND: There are limited pediatric data regarding severe COVID-19 disease. Our study aims to describe the epidemiology and identify risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease in children. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study among children with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR from March to July 2020 at Children's Hospital Colorado. Risk factors for severe disease were analyzed as defined by hospital admission, respiratory support, or critical care. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Among 454 patients identified with SARS-CoV-2, 191 (42.1%) were females, median age 11 years. Fifty-five percent of all patients identified as Hispanic compared with 29% among all hospital visits in 2019 (P < 0.0001). In multivariable analyses, age 0-3 months or >20 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 7.85; P < 0.0001 and aOR, 5.1; P = 0.03, respectively], preterm birth history (aOR, 3.7; P = 0.03), comorbidities [including immunocompromise (aOR, 3.5; P = 0.004), gastrointestinal condition (aOR, 2.7; P = 0.009), diabetes (aOR, 6.6; P = 0.04), asthma (aOR, 2.2; P = 0.04)], and specific symptoms at presentation were predictors for admission. Age 0-3 months or >20 years, asthma, gastrointestinal condition, and similar symptoms at presentation were also predictors for respiratory support. Elevated C-reactive protein was associated with the need for critical care with median of 17.7 mg/dL (IQR, 5.3-22.9) versus 1.95 mg/dL (IQR, 0.7-5.5) among patients requiring critical versus no critical care (OR, 1.2; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Extremes of age, comorbid conditions, and elevated CRP are predictors of severe disease in children. Findings from this study can inform pediatric providers and public health officials to tailor clinical management, pandemic planning, and resource allocation.

Comparison of Upper Respiratory Viral Load Distributions in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Children Diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Pediatric Hospital Testing Programs.

The distribution of upper respiratory viral loads (VL) in asymptomatic children infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is unknown. We assessed PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and estimated VL in infected asymptomatic children diagnosed in nine pediatric hospital testing programs. Records for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with positive clinical SARS-CoV-2 tests were reviewed. Ct values were (i) adjusted by centering each value around the institutional median Ct value from symptomatic children tested with that assay and (ii) converted to estimated VL (numbers of copies per milliliter) using internal or manufacturer data. Adjusted Ct values and estimated VL for asymptomatic versus symptomatic children (118 asymptomatic versus 197 symptomatic children aged 0 to 4 years, 79 asymptomatic versus 97 symptomatic children aged 5 to 9 years, 69 asymptomatic versus 75 symptomatic children aged 10 to 13 years, 73 asymptomatic versus 109 symptomatic children aged 14 to 17 years) were compared. The median adjusted Ct value for asymptomatic children was 10.3 cycles higher than for symptomatic children (P < 0.0001), and VL were 3 to 4 logs lower than for symptomatic children (P < 0.0001); differences were consistent (P < 0.0001) across all four age brackets. These differences were consistent across all institutions and by sex, ethnicity, and race. Asymptomatic children with diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 6.5; P = 0.01), a recent contact (OR, 2.3; P = 0.02), and testing for surveillance (OR, 2.7; P = 0.005) had higher estimated risks of having a Ct value in the lowest quartile than children without, while an immunocompromised status had no effect. Children with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection had lower levels of virus in their nasopharynx/oropharynx than symptomatic children, but the timing of infection relative to diagnosis likely impacted levels in asymptomatic children. Caution is recommended when choosing diagnostic tests for screening of asymptomatic children.

Analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma for SARS-CoV-2 IgG using two commercial immunoassays.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) was approved by the FDA for use in severe cases of COVID-19 under an emergency Investigational New Drug (IND) protocol. Eligibility criteria for CCP donors includes documentation of evidence of COVID-19 either by viral RNA detection at the time of illness or positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG after recovery if diagnostic testing for COVID-19 was not performed at the time of illness. In addition to analysis of CCP, analysis of SARS-CoV-2 IgG provides information for possible past exposure and may support diagnosis when SARS-CoV-2 PCR is negative and clinical suspicion for COVID-19 is high. Furthermore, assays with high sensitivity and specificity for SARS-CoV-2 IgG are critical for understanding community exposure rates to SARS-CoV-2. Currently, there are several assays that test for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 using a variety of methods, including point-of-care lateral flow-based devices, high throughput immunoassay analyzers, and manual methods such as ELISA. These assays target a number of SARS-CoV-2 antigens, including the nucleocapsid protein (N), full length spike protein (S), S1 subunit, or receptor binding domain (RBD) of the S protein. Given the heterogeneity among methods for, and antigenic targets used in SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays, it is necessary for careful evaluation of these assays prior to implementation for clinical use. We compared two assays that had received the CE mark of regulatory approval and that used either the N antigen or S1-RBD antigen as the target for analysis of a large set of CCP samples. Our data indicates that sensitivity and specificity vary between these assays and that more than one antigenic target may be required to improve the sensitivity and specificity of IgG detection to SARS-CoV-2.